Keperluan Prosedur Forensik Digital dalam Pembuktian Jenayah Siber di Mahkamah Syariah: Isu dan Cabaran/ The Need of Digital Forensics Procedure in Proving Cyber Criminal Offences in Malaysian Syariah Courts: Issues and Challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/umran2026.13n2.849Keywords:
Digital forensics; digital evidence; Syariah cyber offences; Syariah court; evidentiary procedure.Abstract
The prosecution of cyber offences in Malaysian Syariah courts faces a procedural gap whereby the Syariah Court Evidence (Federal Territories) Act 1997 [Act 561] has yet to prescribe clear technical standards for the acquisition, analysis and presentation of digital evidence. This has resulted in the evaluation of digital evidence remaining dependent on judicial discretion in the absence of uniform forensic guidelines. This study analyses the need for digital forensic procedures in proving cyber criminal offences in Syariah courts by examining its foundations from technical, legal and Sharīʿah perspectives. Through doctrinal analysis and document analysis, the study examines Act 561 provisions, Practice Direction No. 4 of 2020, Islamic evidentiary principles and selected Syariah court cases involving digital evidence. Findings demonstrate that the provisions on al-kitābah, al-qarīnah and raʾy al-khabīr in Act 561 provide a principled basis for the reception of digital evidence, while Sharīʿah concepts such as maṣlahah, ʿurf and the tradition of inference- and expertise-based proof reinforce the necessity of digital forensics as a contemporary evidentiary method. However, these foundations remain unsupported by adequate technical procedures. Two principal issues are identified: a legislative-technical gap requiring clarification of the legal status of digital evidence and the expansion of Practice Direction No. 4 of 2020 into a more operationally detailed procedural guide and a human capital deficit in digital forensic literacy encompassing Syariah judges, prosecutors, religious enforcement officers and forensic experts. This study advances a technical, legal and Sharīʿah-based justification for the development of standardised digital forensic procedures in Malaysian Syariah courts, thereby contributing to the discourse on reforming the Syariah evidentiary system in confronting the realities of contemporary digital crime.
References
Abdul Qadir 'Audah. (2000). Criminal Law of Islam (S. Z. Aijaz, Trans.) 1. International Islamic Publishers.
Abu Zuhrah, M. (1958). Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Dar al-Fikr al-ʿArabī.
Ahmad, M. H., Baharuddin, A. S., Hashim, H., Abd Rahman Shah, H., Ruskam, A., & Wan Harun, M. A. (2020). Rejuvenating human capital in Syariah legal institutions through fiqh forensics fundamental module: A preliminary review. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 8(1), 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.v8i1.191
Al-Ghazālī, A. Ḥ. M. ibn M. (n.d.). Al-Mustaṣfā min ʿilm al-uṣūl. Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.
Al-Jurjānī, A. M. (1983). al-Taʿrīfāt (1st ed.). Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.
Al-Shāṭibī, A. I. I. ibn M. (n.d.). Al-Muwāfaqāt fī uṣūl al-sharīʿah al-Islāmiyyah. Maṭbaʿat al-Sharq al-Adnā.
Al-Shawkānī, M. A. (2000). Fatḥ al-Qadīr al-Jāmiʿ Bayna Fannayyi al-Riwāyah wa al-Dirāyah min ʿIlmi al-Tafsīr (1st ed.). Beirut: Dar Ibnu Hazm
Al-Shawkānī, M. ibn ʿA. (n.d.). Irshād al-fuḥūl ilā taḥqīq al-ḥaqq min ʿilm al-uṣūl. Dār al-Fikr.
al-Ṭabarī, M. b. J. (2000). Jāmi' al-Bayān fī Ta'wīl al-Qur'ān. 15. Egypt: Muassasah al-Risālah.
al-Zuḥaylī, W. M. (2006). al-Wajīz fī Uṣūl al-Fiqh al-Islāmī.1(2). Dār al-Khayr.
Alias, M. A. A., Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Baharuddin, A. S., Hashim, H., & Tuan Ibrahim, T. M. F. H. (2025). Digital forensics and the admissibility of electronic evidence in Malaysian Syariah courts: Towards a standardised legal framework. LexForensica, 2(1), 84-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33102/6grx4619
Amir Husin, M. N., & Nik Azlan, N. M. (2008). Qarinah: Kajian Penggunaan Alat Pengesan Alkohol di Bahagian Penguatkuasa Jabatan Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan. Jurnal Undang-Undang Dan Masyarakat, 12, 110-130
Auda, J. (2010). Maqasid as Philosophy of Islamic Law. Selangor: Islamic Book Trust.
Caneppele, S., & da Silva, A. (2022). Cybercrime. In Research handbook of comparative criminal justice (pp. 243–260). Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839106385.00024
Casey, E. (2011). Digital Evidence and Computer Crime : Forensic Science, Computers and the Internet (3rd ed.). Academic Press.
Choi, K.-S., Lee, C. S., & Louderback, E. R. (2020). Historical evolutions of cybercrime: From computer crime to cybercrime. In The Palgrave handbook of international cybercrime and cyberdeviance (pp. 27–43). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78440-3_2
Deandra, F. H., Sherly, & Muda, I. (2025). Advancing digital forensic investigations: Addressing challenges and enhancing cybercrime solutions. World Journal of Information Technology, 3(1), 10-15. https://upubscience.com/wjit/article/view/1869
Eldridge, H. (2023). Crime Scene Reconstruction and Event Analysis. In Encyclopedia of Forensic Science. 696–700. Elsevier BV. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-823677-2.00132-x
Hashi, A. A., & Bashiir, A. (2009). Human capital development from Islamic perspective. Paper presented at the International Conference on Human Capital Development, Universiti Malaysia Pahang.
Ibn al-Qayyim, Shams al-Din Muhammad, (n.d.). al-Turuq al-Hukmiyyah. Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyyah.
Ibnu Abī Ḥātim, A. R. M. (1998). Tafsīr al-Qur'ān al-ʿAẓīm (A. M. al-Ṭayyib Ed.) 7(3). Saudi Arabia: Maktabah Nizar Mustafa al-Baz
Ibnu al-Mulaqqin, U. A. (2008). al-Tawḍīḥ li-Sharḥ al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaḥīḥ (D. F. l. B. w. T. al-Turāth Ed. 1st ed. Vol. 4). Damascus: Dar al-Nawādir
Ibnu Hajar al-‘Asqalani, A. A. (2000). Fatḥ al-Bārī Sharḥ Saḥīḥ al-Bukhārī .1. Dar alMa'rifah
Ibnu Kathir, I. U. (1999). Tafsir al-Qurʾān al-ʿAẓīm (S. M. Salamah Ed. 4(2). Riyadh: Dar Thaibah.
Ibrahim, A. (2023). Membangun Negara Madani. Ide Research Centre Sdn Bhd.
Ismaylovna, B. J. (2024). Problems of admissibility and reliability of metadata as evidence. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(8), 1–11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.208
International Organization for Standardization. (2012). ISO/IEC 27037:2012: Information technology—Security techniques—Guidelines for identification, collection, acquisition and preservation of digital evidence. Retrieved November 25, 2025, from https://www.iso.org/standard/44381.html
Kallil, M. K., & Yaacob, A. C. (2019). The integration of digital forensics science and Islamic evidence laws. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 4(17), 61–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35631/ijlgc.417006
Khan, A. A., Shaikh, A. A., Laghari, A. A., Dootio, M. A., Rind, M. M., & Awan, S. A. (2022). Digital forensics and cyber forensics investigation: Security challenges, limitations, open issues, and future direction. International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics, 14(2), 124–150. h DOI: ttps://doi.org/10.1504/IJESDF.2022.121174
Mala, B., Agrawal, S., Sharma, A., & Kaur, R. (2023). Exploring Wireshark For Network Traffic Analysis. IJFMR - International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 5(6), 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i06.8876
Miller, M. T. (2018). A Practical Exercise of the Locard Exchange Principle. In Crime Scene Investigation Laboratory Manual. 13–17. Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-812845-9.00003-0
Mohammad, N. S., & Dalool, R. F. (2024). Contemporary Methods of Criminal Evidence: Examining Modern Scientific Techniques and Their Legal Implications. Kutafin Law Review, 11(4), 788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2024.4.30.788-809
Montasari, R. (2016). The Comprehensive Digital Forensic Investigation Process Model (CDFIPM) for Digital Forensic Practice [Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Digital Forensics].
Muhammad Azhari, A. R. (2015). Meneliti Keterangan Saksi Pakar di Mahkamah Syariah. Paper presented at the Lawyer: One Stop Centre 4, Al Āli al-Bayt University, Jordan.
Mullā ʿAli al-Qārī, A. S. M. (2002). Mirqāt al-Mafātīḥ Sharḥ Mishkāt al-Maṣābīḥ. 6(1). Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Mustafa Zaid. (1964). Al-Maṣlaḥah fī al-tashrīʿ al-Islāmī wa Najm al-Dīn al-Ṭūfī. Dār al-Fikr al-ʿArabī.
Pendakwa Syarie Negeri Sabah lwn. Rosli bin Abdul Japar (2007), 23(2) JH 237 (Keningau Syariah High Court).
Perumal, S., & Norwawi, N. Md. (2010). Integrated computer forensic investigation model based on Malaysian standards. International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics, 3(2), 108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijesdf.2010.033780
Preeti, N., Kumar, M., & Sharma, H. K. (2024). A Guide to Digital Forensic: Theoretical To Software Based Investigations. In Cyber Forensics and Investigation on Smart Devices. 20–48. Bentham Science Publishers . DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/9789815179576124010005
Reedy, P. (2023). Digital evidence: Overview. In J. Siegel, P. Saukko, & M. Houck (Eds.), Encyclopedia of forensic sciences 2(3), 21–24. Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823677-2.00268-3
Rehman, T. U., Parveen, S., Usmani, M. A., & Khan, M. A. Y. (2023). Varieties and skills of cybercrime. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 13(1), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCBPL.324091
Ridha Abdah, S. (2015). Application(s) of Forensic Evidence in Proving Facts in Issue. Paper presented at the Lawyers One Stop Centre (LANCER 2015), Al Āli al-Bayt University, al-Mafraq, Jordan.
Sah, A., Riadi, I., & Prayudi, Y. (2018). Deteksi bukti digital online gambling menggunakan live forensik pada smartphone berbasis android. Cyber security dan forensik digital, 1(1), 14–19. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.14421/csecurity.2018.1.1.1237
Sayyid Quṭb. (2003). Fī Ẓilāl al-Qur'ān (32nd ed. Vol. 5). Cairo: Dar Syuruq.
Sitima, J. (2024). Understanding Digital Forensic Tools: Their Features, Applicability and Key Short Comings. A Compendium. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(6), 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.30026
Sulubara, S. M., Fauzi, H., Muslim, B., Putra, M. F. F., & Musmulyadi. (2025). Judi online sebagai cybercrime serta tantangan penegakan hukum pidana di era digital: Antara regulasi, pembuktian, dan ancaman cybercrime. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, 4(2), 539–552. https://prin.or.id/index.php/JURRISH/article/view/
Tuan Ibrahim, T. M. F. H., Alias, M. A. A., Nor Muhamad, N. H., & Baharuddin, A. S. (2025d). Pembuktian forensik digital di Mahkamah Syariah: Kerangka kebolehterimaan dan integriti dalam jenayah Syariah. Journal of Muwafaqat, 8(2), 78-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53840/muwafaqat.v8i2.197
Tuan Ibrahim, T. M. F. H., Faisal, M. S., Alias, M. A. A., & Baharuddin, A. S. (2025a). Pemetaan Perundangan Seksyen 70 Akta Tatacara Jenayah Syariah (Wilayah-wilayah Persekutuan) 1997 [Akta 560]: Implikasi terhadap Kesalahan Jenayah Syariah di Alam Siber. Kanun: Jurnal Undang-Undang Malaysia, 37(2), 263–282. http://jurnal.dbp.my/index.php/Kanun/article/view/9025
Tuan Ibrahim, T. M. F. H., Nor Muhamad, N. H., & Baharuddin, A. S. (2025c). Maqāsid al-Shariʿah and digital forensics: Towards a fiqh-based evidentiary model in Sharīʿah criminal justice. Al-’Adalah, 22(2), 565–598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v222.27886
Tuan Ibrahim, T. M. F. H., Nor Muhamad, N. H., & Baharuddin, A. S. (2025e). Chain of custody parameters for digital forensic evidence in Shariah criminal court proceedings. IIUM Law Journal, 33(2), 205–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v33i2.1088
Tuan Ibrahim, T. M. F. H., Nor Muhamad, N. H., Alias, M. A. A., & Baharuddin, A. S. (2025b). Fiqh Al-Waqi’: Teras Revolusi Keterangan Forensik Digital Dalam Membendung Jenayah Syariah Siber. Jurnal 'Ulwan, 10(1), 28–46. https://unimel.edu.my/journal/index.php/JULWAN/article/view/1954/1514
Yahya, M. A., Mohd Shariff, A. A., Mohd Arif, M. I. A., Abd Rahman, M. R., Nasri, M. S., & Tuan Ibrahim, T. M. F. H. (2026). Peranan keterangan pakar dalam pembuktian kes Mahkamah Syariah: Analisis berdasarkan qarinah dan maqāṣid al-syari‘ah: The role of expert evidence as a means of proof in Shariah court cases: An analysis based on qarinah and maqāṣid al-shariah. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 14(1), 215–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol14no1.1536
Yahya, M. A., Mohd. Shariff, A. A., & Saifuddin, S. (2023). Application of principles of chain of evidence and chain of custody during storage and forensic examination of electronic documentary evidence in Shariah criminal cases in Malaysia. IIUM Law Journal, 31(S1), 143–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v31iS1.874
Zainul Abidin bin Mat Akhir lwn Ahmad Nazreen bin Zainul Abidin & Seorang Lain (2016), 43(1) JH 17 (Kuala Lumpur Syariah Court of Appeal).
Zarkasyi, A. F. (2013). Tajdid dan Modernisasi Pemikiran Islam. TSAQAFAH, 9(2), 395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v9i2.59
Zaydān, A. K. (1976). al-Wajīz fī Uṣūl al-Fiqh (1st ed.). Muʾassasah al-Risālah.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tuan Muhammad Faris Hamzi Tuan Ibrahim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
