Metodologi Muslim Bin Al-Hajjāj Dalam Kritik Perawi: Kajian Terhadap Muqaddimah Sahīh Muslim/ Methodology Of Muslim Bin Al-Hajjāj In Criticizing Narrators: A Study Of The Muqaddimah Sahīh Muslim
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/umran2025.12n1.764Keywords:
al-jarh wa al-ta’dīl; Muslim bin al-Hajjāj; Muqaddimah Sahīh Muslim; ‘adālah; dhabtAbstract
The science of narrator criticism, or al-jarh wa al-ta’dīl, is one of the essential branches of hadith studies. One of the primary works discussing the principles of this science is Muqaddimah Sahīh Muslim by Muslim bin al-Hajjāj, which has traditionally been regarded as a key reference in understanding narrator criticism. However, questions remain regarding the methodology used by Muslim bin al-Hajjāj in evaluating narrators and how it was applied in the context of narrator criticism. Therefore, this study aims to analyze Muslim bin al-Hajjāj’s methodology in Muqaddimah Sahīh Muslim and assess how his approach influenced the evaluation of narrators’ integrity and accuracy. This study uses a qualitative methodology with a document analysis approach for data collection and content analysis as the main method. The study’s findings indicate that Muslim bin al-Hajjāj’s methodology in Muqaddimah Sahīh Muslim is systematic and detailed, with a particular emphasis on the narrators' integrity (‘adālah) and memory precision (dhabt). He also emphasized the discussion on poor narrator practices, such as failing to screen hadith narrations. The implications of this study provide clearer guidance in understanding the methodology of narrator criticism and contribute to new literature in contemporary hadith studies.
References
‘Abd Allāh al-Sa‘d. (2021). al-Wajīz fī Sharḥ Kitāb al-Tamyīz. Riyadh: Dār al-Adāwah li al-Nasyr.
Abdul Aziz Abdul Latif. (2017). Dhawābit al Jarh wa Ta’dīl (Cetakan ke-6). Madinah: Dār Tayyibah al Khudarā’.
Abdullah Ahmad. (1994). Su’ālāt Abū Dāwud li al-Imām Ahmad. Madinah: Maktabah al-‘Ulūm wa al-Hikam.
Al-Jauharī, I. H. (1987). Al-Şihāh Tāj al-Lughah wa Şihāh al-‘Arabiyyah. Beirut: Dār al-‘Ilm lil al-Malāyyīn.
Al-Juwainī, A. M. A. (1997). Al-Burhān fī Uşūl al-Fiqh. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah.
Al-Khalīlī, K. A. (1989). Al-Irsyād fī Ma’rifah ‘Ulamā al-Hadīth. Riyadh: Maktabah al-Rusyd.
Al-Munawi, M. A. (1999). Al-Yawaqit wa al-Durar fi Syarah Nukhbah Ibn Hajar. Riyadh: Maktabah al-Rusyd.
Al-Sakhawi, S. M. (1993). Fath al-Mugith Syarah Alfiyyah al-Hadith. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Al-Sam’ānī, A. K. M. (1982). Al-Ansāb. India: Majlis Dā’irah al-Ma’ārif al-Uthmāniyyah.
Al-Syahrazuri, A. A. (1986). ‘Ulum al-Hadith. Dimasyq: Dar al-Fikr.
Al-Zahabī, M. A. (1985). Siyar A’lām al-Nubalā’. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risālah.
Al-Zahabī, M. A. (1998). Tazkirah al-Huffāz. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Al-Zarkalī, K. M. (2002). Al-‘A’lām. Beirut: Dār al-‘Ilm li al-Malāyyīn.
Dzulraidi, D. H., Mohd Ithnin, N. K., Amat Famsir @ Amat Tamsir, M. T., & Ayub, D. H. (2024). Konsep Qarā’in Al-Tarjīḥ dalam Pensabitan Samāʿ: Kajian Terhadap Muqarrar Al-Takhrīj Karya Ḥātim Al-ʿAwnī: The Concept of Qarā’in Al-Tarjīḥ in Authenticating Samāʿ: A Study on Muqarrar Al-Takhrīj by Ḥātim Al-‘Awnī. Journal of Ifta and Islamic Heritage, 3(1), 169–196. https://ejournal.muftiwp.gov.my/index.php/jiftah/article/view/67
Hamzah Yūsof al-Sahmī. (1987). Tārikh Jurjān. Beirut: ‘Ālam al-Kutub.
Ibn al-Athīr, M. M. (1979). Al-Nihāyah fī Gharīb al-Hadīth wa al-Athar. Beirut: al-Maktabah al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Ibn Hajar al-‘Asqallānī. (2008). Lisān al-Mīzān. Beirut: Maktabah Beirūt.
Imān Rajab Hamdān. (2024). Al-Tausīq al-Dimnī wa Atharuhu fī Ta’dīl al-Ruwāh. Azhar: Dār al-Zakhāir.
Māzin bin Abdul Rahman. (2006). Tārikh Naysābur. Beirut: Dār al-Basyāir al-Islāmiyyah.
Mohd Awang Idris, Haslina Muhamad, & Zirwatul Aida R. Ibrahim. (2018). Metodologi Penyelidikan Sains Sosial. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Muhammad Bin ‘Alawi. (2003). Al-Qawā’id al-Asāsiyah. Kaherah: Dār al-Hāwi.
Muhammad Bin Muhammad Bin Sulaim. (2010). Al Wasīth fī Ulūmi wa Mustalah al Hadīth. Dār Fikr al ‘Arabī.
Muhammad Bin Mukrim. (1994). Lisān al ‘Arab. Beirut: Dār al Šadir.
Muhammad Bin Sulaimān. (1986). Al Mukhtasar fi ‘Ilmi al Rijāl. Maktabah al Rusyd.
Muhammad Murtadha al Husaini. (2001). Tāj al ‘Arūs. Dār Ihyā’ al Turāth.
Muslim Bin al Hajjāj. (1955). Sahih Muslim. Kaherah: Matba’ah Īsa al Bābī.
Syarīf Hātim al-‘Awnī. (2002). Khulāsah al-Ta’sīl li ‘Ilmi al-Jarh wa al-Ta’dīl. Mekah: Dār ‘Ālim al-Fawāid.
Zulhelmi Mohamed Nor. Ilmu al-Jarh wa al-Ta’dil: Tumpuan Terhadap Ketokohan Imam Bukhari. Jurnal Kuis, 11.
Ali Imron. (2017). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Jarh wa Ta’dil. Mukaddimah: Jurnal Studi Islam, 2(2).
Al-Hararī, M. A. bin ‘A. al-‘A. al-U. (2009). Al-Kawkab al-Wahhāj Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Riyadh: Dār al-Minhāj.
Al-Ityūbī, M. I. al-Sh. al-‘A. ‘A. bin A. bin M. (2003). Qurratu al-ʻAyn al-Muḥtāj fī Sharḥ Muqaddimah Ṣaḥīḥ al-Imām Muslim bin al-Ḥajjāj. Kaherah: Dār Ibn al-Jawzī.
Ibrahim Adham Mohd Rokhibi, & Khadher Ahmad. (2022). Analisis Metode Penerangan Hadith Berʻillah Dalam Sahih Muslim Menurut Ḥamzah Al-Malyabārī. Online Journal Research in Islamic Studies, 9(1), 83-100
Dzulfaidhi Dzulraidi et. Al. (2024). Konsep Qarāin Tarjih Dan Aplikasinya Dalam Kitab Al-Tamyīz Karangan Muslim Bin Al-Ḥajjāj: The Concept Of Qarā’in Al-Tarjīh And Its Application In The Book Al-Tamyīz By Muslim Bin Ḥajjāj. Journal of Fatwa and Falak Selangor, 1(1), 14-36. https://juffas.muftiselangor.gov.my/index.php/jurnal/article/view/17.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Penerbit UTM Press
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright of articles that appear in UMRAN - International Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions or any other reproductions of similar a nature.
