Interreligious Dialogue: From Coexistence To Proexistence (Understanding The Views of Mukti Ali and Hans Kung)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/umran2018.5n2-1.310Keywords:
Pluralistic, globalization, tolerance, cooperation program, InterreligiusAbstract
The present and future worlds are pluralistic. Globalization has a direct effect on all aspects of human life, including religious patterns. The life of religious people in this global world should have a proper vision of their religion and other communities with a positive awareness of diversity. Each community should be aware of the existence of its own group and other groups with all the differences. Herein lies the importance of interreligious dialogue. Initially, the purpose of the interreligious dialogue is to foster pluralistic awareness of tolerance (co-existence) so that people can live together peacefully; however, the present and future dialogues must be actively involved in inter-religious cooperation programs (co-existence) to solve humanitarian problems. Among the initiators of the interfaith dialogue in the context of global life are Mukti Ali and Hans Kung. Although their intellectual and theological base is different, they both share a common vision, mission and a great agenda of interfaith dialogue in order to achieve a dynamic peace.
References
Ali Munhanif. (1989). Prof. Dr. H.A. Mukti Ali: Modernisasi Politik Keagamaan Orde Baru. Menteri-menteri Agama: Biografi Sosial Politik. Jakarta, PPIM.
Amin Abdullah. (1996). Anatomi Kerukunan Umat Beragama: Tinjauan Historis-Sosiologis. (Paper). Yogyakarta: Indonesia.
Avery T. William. (n.d.). Indonesian Revival: Why Two Million Came to Christ. South Pasadena, William Carey.
B.J. Boland. (1985). Pergumulan Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta, Grafiti Press.
Gilles Kepel. (1993). The Revenge of God: The Resurgence of Islam, Christianity and Judaism in Modern World. Pensylvania, The Pensylvania State University Press.
Hans Kung. (1987). Christianity and The World Religions: Paths of Dialogue with Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism. Evantons, Northwestern University Press.
Hans Kung. (1990). Towards a World Ethics of World Religions. CONCILIUM 2.
Hans Kung. (1998). Sebuah Model Dialog Islam-Kristen. Jurnal Paramadina. Vol.1 No.1. Juli-Desember.
Hans Kung. (1999).Project Weltethos. Pieper Verlag GmBH. Munchen. 5 Auflage.
http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans Kung, accessed on October 18, 2017.
Komaruddin Hidayat and Ahmad Gaus AF (eds). (1998). Passing Over: Melintas Batas Agama. Jakarta, Gramedia Pustaka Utama and Gramedia.
Mukti Ali. (1970). Dialog Antar Agama. Yogyakarta, Nida.
Mukti Ali. (1988). Ilmu Perbandingan Agama di Indonesia. Yogyakarta, IAIN Sunan Kalijaga Press.
Mukti Ali. (1990). Ilmu Perbandingan Agama dan Kerukunan Hidup Antar Umat Beragama. 70 Tahun Dr. T.B. Simatupang: Saya adalah orang yang Berhutang. Jakarta, Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Mukti Ali. (1992). Ilmu Perbandingan Agama, Dialog, Dakwah dan Missi. Ilmu Perbandingan Agama di Indonesia dan Belanda. Jakarta, INIS.
Mukti Ali. (1997). Agama, Moralitas dan Perkembangan Kontemporer. Agama dalam Pergumulan Masyarakat Kontemporer. Yogyakarta, Tiara Wacana.
Najiyah Martiam (ed). (n.d.). Jalan Dialog Hans Kung dalam Perspektif Muslim. Yogyakarta, CRCS cooperates with ICRS, ICIP, Swiss Embassy and Mizan.
Nasrullah Ali Fauzi. (1995). Abdul Mukti Ali. Ulumul Qur’an. No.3 Vol.VI.
Robert B. Baowollo. (2010). Menggugat Tanggung Jawab Agama-agama Abrahamik bagi Perdamaian Dunia. Yogyakarta, Kanisius.
Singgih Basuki. (2013). Pemikiran Keagamaan Mukti Ali. Yogyakarta, UIN SUKA Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in UMRAN - International Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions or any other reproductions of similar a nature.