Kaedah Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah (PBD) dan Kesannya Kepada Murid Tahap Satu: Analisis Subjek Pendidikan Islam/ Classroom Assessment Method (PBD) And Its Impact On Level One Pupils: Analysis Of Islamic Education Subjects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/umran2024.11n1.678Keywords:
Islamic education, Assessment, Classroom Assessment, Level of mastery, Level OneAbstract
Teachers frequently employ testing techniques as an assessment tool. However, in October 2018, the Minister of Education stopped the evaluation using this testing technique. When parents questioned the impartiality of instructors in evaluating their children’s accomplishments, the outcomes of the removing the examination caused negative response. Additionally, they lack clarity and comprehension of the teacher’s methodologies and procedures for evaluation. This article produced to understand the Classroom Assessment Method (PBD) and how it affects level one students studying Islamic Education. The philosophy behind this study is interpretive, while the study strategy is case studies. The study also adapted qualitative design with data collection methods using a combination of document content analysis techniques and semi-structured question interviews. The content analysis approach was used in the data analysis. Thematic methods are used in this study to categorise the results. There are three methods used by teachers in assessing level one students – 1) observation 2) writing and 3) oral methods. However, the assessment using these three methods in determining the level of mastery (TP) of the pupils is very subjective. Thus, two effectswas identified on the application of PBD, namely, the reduced burden of teachers’ duties related to the examination and the occurrence of teacher injustices in the PBD process. In this context, the report recommends that the Ministry of Education’s (MOE) PBD system undergo revisions to ensure that level one students get assessed equitably. Teachers should also employ the scoring rubric while implementing the three established PBD assessment techniques. After further research on other topics, it is also appropriate to revaluate the PBD approach. In addition, the scoring rubric should be used by teachers in the implementation of PBD assessment using three predefined methods.
References
Abdullah, E. & Shukor, A. A. A. (2012). Pentaksiran Prestasi dan Pentaksiran Rujujan Standard dalam Bilik Darjah. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI): Perak.
Arsaythamby, V. (2011). Keupayaan Teori dan Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran dalam Pembelajaran. Journal of Governance and Development (JGD). 7, 8-15. Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM).
Azmanirah, A. R., Nurfirdawati, M. H., Anizam, M. Y. & Halizah, A. (2019). Analisis Kefungsian Skala Bagi Pembinaan Rubrik Pentaksiran Kompetensi Amali: Analisis Berdasarkan Model Pengukuran Rasch Pelbagai Facet. Online Journal For TVET Practitioners. 4(2), 120-126. Universiti Tun Hussien Onn (UTHM).
Babbie, E. (2002). The Practice of Social Research. 12th ed. Belmont California, Wadsworth.
Bin Roslan, M. M. (2023). Hubungan Kesan Psikologi dan Masalah Sosial dengan Teori Hifz Al-Nafs dalam Fatwa Penamaan Nasab Anak Tak Sah Taraf: Analisis Fatwa Kebangsaan: The Relationship of Psychological Effects and Social Problems with Hifz Al-Nafs Theory in The Fatwa on the Named Lineage of Illegitimate Children: National Fatwa Analysis. Jurnal Pengajian Islam, 16(1), 86–100. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.53840/jpi.v16i1.240. Retrieved at 27 Jun 2023.
Burke, K. (2001). From Standards to Rubric in Six Steps. A Sage Company.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morisson. (2000). Research Methods in Education. 2nd ed. Croom Helm: London.
Creswell, J. W. (2002). Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. n.d. United Kingdom Sage: London.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. n.d. Thousand Oask: CA, Sage.
Fullan, M. (2018). Nuance: Why Some Leaders Succeed and Others Fail. Corwin Press.
Ghazali, D. & Sufean, H. (2021). Metodologi Penyelidikan dalam Pendidikan Amalan dan Analisis Kajian. 3rd ed. Universiti Malaya (UM).
Goodrich, H. (1996). Understanding Rubrics. Educational Leadership. 54(4), 14-17.
Hazuriana, H. & Khairul, J. (2022). Kesediaan Guru dalam Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah di Sekolah Rendah. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan.. 4(4), 119-125. Asian Scholars Network.
Ilhavenil, N., Wan Nor Fadzilah, W. H., Loges Arumugam, M. P., Noor Aliza, N. & Nooraini, K. (2022). Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah Sekolah Rendah. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366928346_Pelaksanaan_Pentaksiran_Bilik_Darjah_Sekolah_Rendah. Retrieved at 27 Jun 2023.
Joohari, A. & Kalai Selvan, A. (2021). Pemansuhan Ujian Penilaian Sekolah Rendah (UPSR) dan Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah (PBD): Satu Tinjauan dalam Kalangan Guru Besar. Asian People Journal 4(2). 80-89. Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UNISZA).
Kamus Dewan Bahasa. (2012). 4th ed. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Effective Evaluation. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.
Mabry, M. C. (2004). Detecting and Measuring Rater Effects Using Many-Facet Rasch Measurement: Part II. Journal of Applied Measurement. 5(2), 189-227.
Malaysia. Panduan Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah. (2019). 2nd ed. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). Retrieved from: https://www.moe.gov.my/muat-turun/pentaksiran-berasaskan-sekolah/5505-panduan-pelaksanaan-pentaksiran-bilik-darjah-edisi-2-2019/file. Retrieved at 27 Jun 2023.
Malaysia. Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah (PBD). (2016). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Retrieved from: https://www.moe.gov.my/soalan-lazim-menu/kurikulum/kurikulum.
Maridah, A. (2013). Definisi Pentaksiran, Pengujian dan Penilaian. Retrieved from: http://drmaridah.blogspot.com/2013/06/definisi-pentaksiran-pengujian-dan.html. Retrieved at 27 Jun 2023.
Maszlee. M. (2019). 10 Sebab Peperiksaan Tahap Satu Dimansuhkan – Maszlee Malik. Retrieved from: https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/nasional/2019/01/516704/10-sebab-peperiksaan-tahap-satu-dimansuhkan-maszlee. Retrieved at 27 Jun 2023.
Miles, B. M. & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Source Book. Sage: California.
Mohamad Ikhmal, A. A., Marzni, M. M., Md Mustakim, M. U. & Mohamad As Syafie, A. (2022). Penguasaan Kemahiran Lisan Bakal Guru Bahasa Melayu: Tinjauan Terhadap Tahap Pengetahuan, Kemahiran dan Masalah Pembelajaran dalam Talian Semasa Pandemik. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan. 4(2), 103-114. Asian Scholars Network.
Muslim, M. S. (2016). Varian-Varian Paradigma, Pendekatan, Metode, dan Jenis Penelitian dalam Ilmu Komunikasi. Jurnal Wahana. 1(10), 78. Universitas Pakuan, Indonesia.
Mustaqim Roslan, M. (Interviewer). (2023 March 19). Interview with Guru Pendidikan Islam. (Recorder). Sekolah Kebangsaan Dato’ Naning, Alor Gajah – Melaka.
Mustaqim Roslan, M. (2023). Hifz al-Nafs dalam Fatwa Penamaan Nasab Anak Tak Sah Taraf: Analisis Kesan Psikologi dan Masalah Sosial. (Postgraduate Thesis). Universiti Sultan Azlan Shah (USAS), Perak.
Mustaqim Roslan, M. (Interviewer). (2022 Disember 6). Interview with Guru Kelas 3 al-Ghazali. (Recorder). Sekolah Kebangsaan Raja Perempuan Muzwin, Kuala Kangsar – Perak Darul Ridzuan.
Mustaqim Roslan, M. (Interviewer). (2023 March 18). Interview with Guru Pendidikan Islam. (Recorder). Sekolah Kebangsaan Dato Abu Bakar Baginda, Kajang – Selangor Darul Ihsan.
Mustaqim Roslan, M. (Interviewer). (2023 March 19). Interview with Guru Pendidikan Islam. (Recorder). Sekolah Kebangsaan Pekan Telupid – Sabah.
Mustaqim Roslan, M. (Interviewer). (2023 March 19). Interview with Guru Pendidikan Islam. (Recorder). Sekolah Kebangsaan Pekan Telupid – Sabah.
Mustaqim Roslan, M. (Interviewer). (2023 March 31). Interview with Guru Pendidikan Islam. (Recorder). Sekolah Kebangsaan Bukit Lalang, Semporna – Sabah.
Patton, Q. M. (2002). Qualitative Evaluation Methods. n.d. Beverly Hill California: Sage Publication.
Pickford, R. & Brown, S. (2007). Assessing Skills and Practice. London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Popham, W. J. (2000). Modern Educational Measurement: Practical Guidelines for Educational Leaders. 3rd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Raha, A. (2014). Definisi dan Konsep Penulisan. Retrieved from: https://www.scribd.com/doc/236190415/Definisi-Dan-Konsep-Penulisan. Retrieved at 27 Jun 2023.
Reddy, Y. M. & Andrade, H. (2010). A Review of Rubric Use in Higher Education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 35(4), 435-448.
Roslan, M. M. (2023). Symptoms of Social Problems Regarding the Named Lineage of Illegitimate Children to Abdullah: National Fatwa Analysis. Firdaus Journal, 3(1), 39–50. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.37134/firdaus.vol3.1.5.2023. Retrieved at 27 Jun 2023.
Roslan, M. M. (2023). Metodologi Pendalilan terhadap Fatwa Pensabitan Nasab Anak Tak Sah Taraf di Malaysia: Analisis Penamaan kepada Abdullah: Argument Methodology Against Fatwa Conviction of Illegitimate Children’s Lineage in Malaysia: Analysis of the Appointment Name to Abdullah. Journal of Muwafaqat, 6(2), 19–34. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.53840/muwafaqat.v6i2.140. Retrieved at 27 Jun 2023.
Roslan, M. M., & Zainuri, A. O. . (2023). Kekhilafan Menerapkan Maqasid Syariʻah Dalam Pengeluaran Fatwa: Analisis Ijtihad Maqasidi: Arguments In Applying Maqasid Syariʻah In The Fatwa Issuance: An Ijtihad Maqasidi Analysis. Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, 28(1), 132-148. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol28no1.464. Retrieved at 27 Jun 2023.
Roslan, M. M. (2022). The Problem of Depression Regarding the Namement of Illegitimate Children’s Lineage to Abdullah: National Fatwa analysis. Firdaus Journal, 2(2), 31–42. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.37134/firdaus.vol2.2.4.2022. Retrieved at 27 Jun 2023.
Roslan, M. M., & Osman Zainuri, A. (2023). Teori Hifz Al-Nafs Dalam Maqasid Syariah: Analisis Pendalilan: The Theory of Hifz Al-Nafs In Maqasid Syariah: Argumentation Analysis. Journal of Muwafaqat, 6(1), 1–13. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.53840/muwafaqat.v6i1.121. Retrieved at 27 Jun 2023.
Siti Saniah, A. B. (2013). Kekangan Pelajar Asing dalam Menggunakan Kemahiran Bertutur Bahasa Melayu. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu (JPBM). 3(1), 56-62. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM).
Thorndike, R. L. (2001). Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and Education. 6th ed. Merill, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Colombus.
Van Maanen, J. (1983). Qualitative Methodology. n.d. Beverly Hill California, Sage Publication.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Penerbit UTM Press
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright of articles that appear in UMRAN - International Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions or any other reproductions of similar a nature.
