An Analysis of Harta Sepencarian Cases in the Syariah High Court of Ipoh

Authors

  • Zanariah Noor Department of Islamic Studies, Faculty of Human Sciences, Sultan Idris Education University, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
  • Muhammad Akramin Kamarul Zaman Department of Islamic Studies, Faculty of Human Sciences, Sultan Idris Education University, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
  • Husna Husain Department of Islamic Studies, Faculty of Human Sciences, Sultan Idris Education University, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/umran2023.10n3.644

Keywords:

Marital Property; Islamic Family Law; Syariah High Court

Abstract

Disputes over matrimonial assets, or harta sepencarian, as it is commonly known in Malaysia, are among the financial cases filed in the Syariah High Court of Ipoh. Although there are specific provisions in the Islamic Family Law Enactment (Perak) 2004 on the division of harta sepencarian, there are some questions, particularly regarding the judicial approach used by judges in determining which parties are entitled to make claims, categories of assets that are considered to be part of harta sepencarian, the interpretation of matters related to the direct and indirect contribution, as well as the proportion of distribution of the assets. This study applies document analysis techniques by referring to the files of the related cases recorded from 2011 - 2016 at the Syariah High Court of Ipoh, and also cases that were reported in law journals as a basis for comparison to clarify the issues discussed. The findings show that although the decisions of the Syariah High Court of Ipoh on issues raised in such cases are not much different from what is decided in the cases reported in the law journals or other Syariah Courts in Malaysia, there are several other aspects, namely on the matter of EPF savings, gratuity, and insurance compensation, where the decisions held by the Syariah High Court of Ipoh are different from existing fatwas (legal opinions on Islamic law) and approaches taken by other Syariah Courts in Malaysia. The different approaches are also noted in cases where the disputing parties have children. Although the rights of disputing parties are properly considered in deciding the cases, in certain cases priority is given to the welfare of the children, and the Court grants property rights to the children.

Author Biography

Zanariah Noor, Department of Islamic Studies, Faculty of Human Sciences, Sultan Idris Education University, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia

Senior Lecturer, Department of Islamic Studies

References

Al-Quran

Abd al-Rahman bin Muhammad bin Husayn bin Umar, (1994). Bughyat al-Mustarshidin fi Talkhis Fatawa Ba’dh al-Aimmah min al-‘Ulama al-Muta’akhirin. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 261.

Abd. Rahman Thobroni (2017). The interview was conducted on 25th April 2017.

Ahmad bin Muhammad Al-Zarqa’ (1989). Sharh al-Qawa’id al-Fiqhiyyah. Damsyik: Dar al-Qalam.

Ahmad Ibrahim (1997). Family Law in Malaysia. Malayan Law Journal. Kuala Lumpur:

Ahmad Ibrahim (2001). Undang-undang Keluarga Islam di Malaysia. Malayan Law Journal. Kuala Lumpur

al-Sayyid al-Bakri Ibn Muhammad Syataa Al-Dumyatiy (n.d). Hashiyah I'anah al-Talibin, 4. Dar al-Fikr.

Islamic Family Law Enactment (Perak) (2004).

Mimi Kamariah Majid (1997). Family Law in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Malayan Law Journal. Kuala Lumpur

Mohamad Ali Roshidi Ahmad (2021). Permasalahan Tuntutan Harta Sepencarian Dalam Pembahagian Harta Pusaka, Journal of Fatwa and Management Research 24 (2), 118-131.

Mohd Norhusairi Mat Hussin & Mohd Zaidi Daud (2020). Sejarah Dan Perkembangan Amalan Pembahagian Harta Sepencarian dalam Masyarakat Islam di Malaysia, Journal of Al Tamaddun, 15(2), 95-113.

Mualimin Mochammad Sahid, Setiyawan Gunardi & Nur Muhammad Hadi Bin Zahalanet (2020). Konsep Uruf dan Maslahah sebagai Sumber Rujukan: Status Wanita Terhadap Harta Sepencarian dalam Perundangan Islam di Malaysia, Journal al-‘Abqari 23(2), 139-156.

Muhammad al-Tahir bin Muhammad Ibn ‘Ashur (1984). Al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir. 5. Tunis: Al-Dar al-Tunisiyyah li al-Nashr.

Mustafa Adib Al-Bugha (2007). Athar al-Adillat al-Mukhtalaf Fiha. Damsyik: Dar al-Qalam.

Nur Sarah Tajul Urus, Shahmi Awang, Mohd Syahmil Samsudin & Alias Azhari (2021). Sumbangan Simbolik dalam Pembahagian Aset Harta Sepencarian di Malaysia: Satu Permintaan Pasca Perceraian, Journal of Fatwa Management and Research 24(2), 1-39.

Rabi’ah Muhammad Serji Mazliza Mohamad Safinaz Mohd Hussein Mahmud Zuhdi Mohd Nor (2021). Harta Sepencarian: Isu dan Konflik Perundangan dalam Tuntutan Selepas Kematian dari Perspektif Undang-Undang Tanah di Malaysia. ISLĀMIYYĀT 43 (Special Edition), 43 – 53.

Siti Zalikha Md. Nor (1996). Pemilikan Harta dalam Perkahwinan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Zaleha Kamaruddin (2009). Hukum Harta Sepencarian dari Sudut Pandangan Wanita Peneroka FELDA, In. Akmal Hidayah Halim et.al, Undang-undang Harta dan Amanah. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Undang-undang M. Hashim.

List of Cases

ABNA vs JG and Seven Others, Civil Case: 08100-017-0704-2014.

ARNA vs JG and Others, Civil Case: 08100-017-0704-2014.

Awang bin Abdul Rahman vs Shamsuddin bin Awang and Zainuddin bin Awang, (1997) 11 JH 193.

HK vs NY and Seven Others, Civil Case: 08100-017-0416-2011.

HRH vs MRMO, Civil Case: 08100-017-0582-2012.

Isa Abd. Rahman v Fatimah Mohammad [2006] 1 CLJ (Sya) 273.

Jaliah v Abu Bakar (1990-1991) 7 JH 72.

JMJ vs NAH, Civil Case: 08100-017-0215-2015.

Kalthom v Nordin (1994) 9 JH 178,

KI vs MJMJ and Two Others, Civil Case: 08100-017-0509-2014.

Leow Kooi Wah vs Philip Ng Kok Seng (1997) 3 MLJ 133.

MBJ vs SNSA, Civil Case: 08700-017-0376-2011.

NMA vs AC and Five Others, Civil Case: 08100-017-0598-2013.

NMJ vs RU and Five Others, Civil Case: 08100-017-0184-2013.

NY vs MNA, Civil Case: 08700-017-0113-2014.

Ong Chin Ngoh vs Lam Chih Kian (1993) 1 SLR (R) 460.

Ramah v Laton (1981- 1983) 2 JH 21

RMS vs RK and Five Others, Civil Case 08100-017-0367- 2014.

Rokiah v Mohamed Idris (1988-1989) 6 JH 72

Semek Mamat v Zubaidah Yasim, (1997) 11 JH 153.

Sharifah Sapoyah vs Wan Alwi (1989) 6 JH (2) 259.

SR vs ZS, Civil Case: 08100-017-0636-2012.

Tengah vs Ibrahim (1982) 5 JH (2) 300.

TKM vs MMAM, Civil Case: 08700-017-0242-2012.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-06

How to Cite

Noor, Z., Kamarul Zaman, M. A., & Husain, H. (2023). An Analysis of Harta Sepencarian Cases in the Syariah High Court of Ipoh. UMRAN - Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies, 10(3), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.11113/umran2023.10n3.644