Preliminary Exploration of Professional Development Instrument for Lecturers in Malaysia

Authors

  • Ahmad Faizuddin Kulliyyah of Education, International Islamic University Malaysia, Jalan Gombak, 53100, Selangor, Malaysia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4668-8870
  • Tajulashikin Jumahat Kulliyyah of Education, International Islamic University Malaysia, Jalan Gombak, 53100, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Mohamad Sahari Nordin Kulliyyah of Education, International Islamic University Malaysia, Jalan Gombak, 53100, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/umran2020.7n2.298

Keywords:

Professional development, knowledge enhancement, knowledge relevancy, skills improvement, skills practice, exploratory factor analysis (EFA)

Abstract

Professional development is crucial for organization’s success to improve teaching-learning programs at higher learning education institutions. Many countries have developed various programs for lecturer training and development. However, there are barriers preventing them from taking the opportunities, especially finding the right time and the appropriate programs. This study explored the construct of lecturers’ professional development in teaching and learning after attending various trainings and workshops. The main objective of this study is to identify the underlying factor of the instrument based on Kirkpatrick’s Four Level Evaluation Framework namely reaction, learning, behaviour, and results. Using an 18-item instrument developed for an explorative inquiry, the present study measured and analysed responses from 100 higher education lecturers from randomly selected Public Higher Learning Institution, Private Higher Learning Institution, and Malaysia Technical University Network. Applying Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) to identify the underlying dimensions of the instrument, this study suggested that lecturer’s professional development in teaching and learning is a one-dimension construct consisting of integrated dimensions of knowledge enhancement, knowledge relevancy, skills improvement, and skills practice.

References

Bartlett, J. E., Kortlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational Research: Determining Appropriate Sample Size In Survey Research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43-50.

Bubb, S., & Earley, P. (2013). The Use of Training Days: Finding Time for Teachers’ Professional Development. Educational Research, 55(3), 236-248. DOI: 10.1080/00131881.2013.825161.

Cahill, J., Bowyer, J., Rendell, C., Hammond, A., & Korek, S. (2015). An Exploration Of How Programme Leaders In Higher Education Can Be Prepared And Supported To Discharge Their Roles And Responsibilities Effectively. Educational Research, 57(3), 272-286.

Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.

Dekker-Groen, A. M., Van Der Schaaf, M. F., & Stokking, K. M. (2013). A Teacher Competence Development Programme for Supporting Students’ Reflection Skills. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 19(2), 150-171. DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2013.741837.

Dias, D., & Sá, M. J. (2014). Transition to Higher Education: The Role of Initiation Practices. Educational Research, 56(1), 1-12.

Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. (1988). Relation of Sample Size To The Stability Of Component Patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265-275.

Harland, J., & Kinder, K. (1997). Teachers' Continuing Professional Development: Framing a Model of Outcomes. Journal of In-Service Education, 23(1), 71-84.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey, NJ: Pearson Education.

Holec, H. (2011). Training Teachers To Cope With The Inherent Variability Of Their Office. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 111-118. DOI: 10.1080/17501229.2011.577528.

Horn, J. L. (1965). A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.

Humphreys, L. G, & Montanelli, R. G. (1975). An Investigation of the Parallel Analysis Criterion for Determining the Number of Common Factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 10, 193-205.

Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187-200.

Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2007). Implementing The Four Levels: A Practical Guide For Effective Evaluation Of Training Programs. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

LeAD Bulletin (Issue 3, October 2008). AKEPT Quarterly: Higher Education Leadership Academy Bulletin. Putrajaya: Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia.

Matsunaga, M. (2011). How To Factor-Analyze Your Data Right: Do’s, Don'ts, and How-To’s . International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97–110.

Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2013). Applied Multivariate Research: Design and Interpretation (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Pereira, F., Lopes, A., & Marta, M. (2015). Being a Teacher Educator: Professional Identities And Conceptions Of Professional Education. Educational Research, 57(4), 451-469.

Postholm, M. B. (2012). Teachers’ Professional Development: A Theoretical Review. Educational Research, 54(4), 405-429. DOI: 10.1080/00131881.2012.734725.

Schlager, M. S., & Fusco, J. (2003). Teacher Professional Development, Technology, And Communities Of Practice: Are We Putting The Cart Before The Horse? The Information Society: An International Journal, 19(3), 203-220. DOI: 10.1080/01972240309464.

Subramaniam, K., & Esprívalo Harrell, P. (2015). An Analysis of Prospective Teachers’ Knowledge For Constructing Concept Maps. Educational Research, 57(3), 217-236.

Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Trent, J. (2014). ‘I’m Teaching, but I’m Not Really A Teacher’. Teaching Assistants and the Construction of Professional Identities In Hong Kong Schools. Educational Research, 56(1), 28-47.

Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale Development Research: A Content Analysis and Recommendations for Best Practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. doi:10.1177/0011000006288127.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-28

How to Cite

Faizuddin, A., Jumahat, T., & Nordin, M. S. (2020). Preliminary Exploration of Professional Development Instrument for Lecturers in Malaysia. UMRAN - Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies, 7(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.11113/umran2020.7n2.298

Issue

Section

Civilizational Studies